 | | Re: GA in RCX
|
|
(...) I like the multiple robot idea. If each robot used a simulated annealing algorithm instead of a GA this would require less computation since it would be working on one chromosome instead of a population. Each robot could advertise its fitness (...) (24 years ago, 25-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC and rcx2
|
|
(...) No doc yet. It probably won't happen for a while. There are still features that need to be implemented! Dave (24 years ago, 25-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC and rcx2
|
|
(...) Documentation is always the last thing to get done.... Until I get it completed, your best bet is to read the lego documentation - especially the opcodes monel,monex,monal, and monax. The monitor/catch works like this: monitor(events) { // (...) (24 years ago, 25-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | LCD_NUMBER, made it work.
|
|
(...) I got it finally after re-reading the doc a few times. My arguements were in the wrong order. (24 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | LCD_NUMBER, Can't make it work.
|
|
The following has no effect: HEX 3002 301F 22 LCD_NUMBER LCD_REFRESH The following do as expected: LCD_4TH LCD_REFRESH LCD_CLEAR LCD_REFRESH Am I missing something? I've tried a few other things with LCD_NUMBER. Once I got 9999 on the display (that (...) (24 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: grasshopper learns new tricks
|
|
(...) Considering that it has been almost 20 years from my first attempt you should rather say "about time." CREATE DOES> is important to me because it is sort of a minimalist object creator in the sense that it allows the creation of classes of (...) (24 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | RE: grasshopper learns new tricks
|
|
(...) Phew, it pushes most people over the edge of sanity.... (...) But the dew is still fresh on the grass, young apprentice, and the hot sun may yet inflict harm to you in unexpected ways... Cheers, Ralph Hempel - P.Eng ---...--- Check out pbFORTH (...) (24 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | grasshopper learns new tricks
|
|
CREATE DOES>, VALUE and EVALUATE. Thank's guys. These will all enhance my code. I knew about CREATE DOES> but never really understood it. Your description pushed me finally over the edge of basic comprehension. EVALUATE is really cool and VALUE is (...) (24 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | CONSTANTS and VALUES in pbForth
|
|
(...) There are a couple of things in this note. One is an introduction to CREATE DOES> and the other is a solution to your actual problem. Basically, what CREATE DOES> does is separate the run-time and compile time semantics of a word. This is (...) (24 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: Forth question
|
|
(...) You might want to try : zzz S" CONSTANT ONE" EVALUATE ; 1 zzz (...) I think VALUE can be used for that. Ernst (24 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
