 | | Re: controling two motors with only one output?
|
|
Indeed, your circuitry is interesting (I'm not sure though it would save time, since soldering can be pretty tedious...). But the challenge here is to make it out of Lego. (and not destroy one piece, by the way...). Denis. (...) Denis Cousineau, (...) (25 years ago, 3-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | gcc 2.95.2 8?(
|
|
First, I must apologise for posting the wrong URL to my update. It's actually at (URL) 8?/ OK. I bit the bullet & installed egcs 1.1.2 as well. I've confirmed two things: 1. My memcpy/memset update doesn't break under egcs, and 2. gcc 2.95.2 causes (...) (25 years ago, 3-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | problem building bugbot3.nqc in cybermaster
|
|
When I try to compila bugbot3.nqc (the code of the Dave's wonderfull book) using my cybermaster as target, the compiler return twice the following error: SENSOR_TOUCH not defined I used the command line nqc -TCM bugbot3.nqc with NQC 2.3 thanks in (...) (25 years ago, 3-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Checksum download of text to RCX
|
|
(...) would (...) Can do... Currently a line is transmitted as <text>NL<checksum>, so a checksummed line can already be distinguished from a non-checksummed, CR-terminated line. Adding a line header (any objections against STX?) is more failsafe, of (...) (25 years ago, 3-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: sending output to LCD possible?
|
|
(...) Not possible with the existing RCX firmware. However the RCX 2.0 firmware (currently in early-alpha) does support displaying a variable (and almost anything else) on the LCD. These operations will be available in NQC...but only when targetting (...) (25 years ago, 3-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | sending output to LCD possible?
|
|
I skimmed through the NQC docs but I didn't see anything about sending messages to the display on the RCX. Is it possible? More specifically, sending the value of a variable to the display? I have a little robot that I plan to use to count things, I (...) (25 years ago, 3-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: RIS 2.0 PreAlpha SDK
|
|
(...) I believe the PBBattery() command is very different from using the Battery 'data source'. Specifically, the command is direct only (after all, there's no equivalent within a program for the response data from a command). However, data sources (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx) !
|
| |
| | RE: Checksum download of text to RCX
|
|
(...) This is a neat idea, Ernst. I think it would be a good addition to the pbForth system if we can allow the user to use it for text uploads and then switch to normal mode for interactive use. (...) I'll have to think about this a bit.. (...) (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Checksum download of text to RCX
|
|
I wrote a simple addition to pbforth that allows it to receive text with a checksum across every line. Every line is ACK/NAK-ed and if necessary resent. Timeouts are not implemented. Now, the main word looks like this: : PBX-RECEIVE ( -- ) BEGIN (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: 0.2.4 coming?
|
|
(...) I suppose you could call what is in CVS at sourceforge 0.2.4, especially after someone adds in Ross's patches, 0.2.4. The advantage of CVS is that we can now all get /the/ most up-to-date version of legOS. The disadvantage is that what you are (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
