 | | Re: Kernel dies after loading (was: Re: legOS-0.2.2)
|
|
(...) A quick grep of the sources show that only a few things (other than lnp, which depends very heavily on interrupts) need the interrupts- task visualization and sound appear to be the two victims. If you don't need these and don't want to worry (...) (25 years ago, 15-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Kernel dies after loading (was: Re: legOS-0.2.2)
|
|
(...) In theory, everything should work with an unpatched cross compiler, too. legOS code checks a preprocessor define, CONF_RCX_COMPILER, I think, to determine whether patched or unpatched compilers are used. The problem is, I don't have an (...) (25 years ago, 15-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Kernel dies after loading (was: Re: legOS-0.2.2)
|
|
As I understand it, the patch provides support for interrupts, which, at least from my glance over the code, are necessary only for LNP stuff. (Markus, feel free to correct me on this.) So, it will compile with your "old" cross compiler and provide (...) (25 years ago, 15-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Kernel dies after loading (was: Re: legOS-0.2.2)
|
|
(...) does this mean legOS will or at least should compile and run without the patch ? if that's true -- what is the actual effect of the patch ? (25 years ago, 15-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Connecting two RCX's
|
|
Joost Reuzel wrote in message ... (...) Apparantly you can just do that. I tried it; it works and it *should* not be harmful. Note, the output should be in the right direction. Eric (25 years ago, 15-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
