 | | Re: Messing with memory pool
|
|
(...) Okay, thanks for the tip. It was a bit unnecessary for you to spend two paragraphs on that, though; a sentence or two would have sufficed. :-) (...) Code is as follows: if (!mem) mem= (char*)(VarsCmd.Pool); memset(mem, 0, POOL_MAX_SIZE); I'm (...) (17 years ago, 17-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt.nxthacking)
|
| |
| | Re: Messing with memory pool
|
|
(...) There is no such thing as an NXT-G memory pool. The standard NXT firmware has nothing to do with the graphical programming language implemented by LEGO and NI which is called NXT-G. (...) Why are you setting it to 0x00 if other parts of the (...) (17 years ago, 17-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt.nxthacking)
|
| |
| | Colors, LDconfig, etc...
|
|
Is there some project to extend LDconfig.ldr to include some recent colors such as Light Stone Gray? Case in point: NXT parts are presently coded in color 383, which works fine with most CAD program but is - as intended - shown as chrome (shiny (...) (17 years ago, 17-Jul-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Java for NXT
|
|
LeJOS NXJ 0.3 is out! After a long and painful delay (especially for the developers) the new and improved version of leJOS NXJ is finally available. This new version has many new features including storing programs and data to flash memory, a menu (...) (17 years ago, 17-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Messing with memory pool
|
|
I'm working on a custom firmware with a new VM. I'm currently trying to reuse the NXT-G memory pool to hold data for the new VM, but I'm running into problems. Apparently, doing a memset to set all of the pool to 0x00 causes the firmware to crash. (...) (17 years ago, 16-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt.nxthacking)
|
| |
| | New NXC/NBC release is available
|
|
I have released today beta 31 of NBC/NXC. Lots and lots of fixes and enhancements. Some of your code may not compile due to fixes that I have made to the parser. It used to let things get past which it should not have been allowing such as extra (...) (17 years ago, 13-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: Teaching Bluetooth and Protocols
|
|
(...) Sounds like a great way to test. We could probably try the experiment tomorrow. At the moment, the 10 boys in this week's class are more inclined to play "grab the flag" using automonous robots than BT Remote Control. We experienced the 5 pair (...) (17 years ago, 12-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | NXTasy challenge #3
|
|
For those not reading TheNXTStep not NXTasy (are there any?) - I organize a new community challenge over NXTasy forums. The challenge is to build a NXT 'ANT' ('ANxT' for short) which carrys a weight over 1 meter distance above ground. The extra fun (...) (17 years ago, 12-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: Teaching Bluetooth and Protocols
|
|
(...) As soon as I get ten NXTs handy, I'll be sure to test this. In fact, I may know somebody who could test this (or at least I can think of a place, NI Week, where I might). Very odd. Try this. Establish five pairs, and then establoish a sixth (...) (17 years ago, 12-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: Teaching Bluetooth and Protocols
|
|
(...) Strange indeed, But, that's what we experienced. I have faith that more than 5 pairs can communicate all at the same time. On the other hand, maybe we used up all the channels. Perhaps like in RC airplanes, we ran out of crystals. (17 years ago, 11-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
