To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.nxtOpen lugnet.robotics.nxt in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / NXT / *1261 (-5)
  Re: Text languages for programming NXT?
 
I'm getting back into Mindstorms after a long hiatus. Let me resurrect this old thread, to see what the answer is in 2010. :-) What text-based languages are most mature and best-supported these days for programming RCX and NXT? Is RobotC still (...) (16 years ago, 28-Aug-10, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
 
  Re: NXT Newbie "Is it possible" question
 
(...) I'm not sure how much time you have, or what resources... but you might be able to do this with a single set. If you put an arm on each motor, such that "track A" would hit a peg and turn the motor clockwise, but "Track B" would hit a peg on (...) (16 years ago, 24-Aug-10, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
 
  Re: NXT Newbie "Is it possible" question
 
(...) Well, just for diversity here's a slightly different approach. Make the first block a "Reset Timer" block, then split the program into four sequences. Each is simply a "Wait for Touch Sensor", followed by "Read Timer" block with the result (...) (16 years ago, 24-Aug-10, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
 
  Re: NXT Newbie "Is it possible" question
 
Thanks Kevin! That gives me a good start. once I get some sort of working model, I'll share with world for some good old fashion criticism. Chris (16 years ago, 19-Aug-10, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
 
  Re: How is this?
 
(...) Yes, change the "wait for 9" to be a "check for 9", and the problem should go away... Loop forever if Touched and distance < 9 { turn on motor } else { turn off motor } Kevin (16 years ago, 19-Aug-10, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR