Subject:
|
Is there a benefit in delegating processing tasks?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.handyboard
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 01:03:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
543 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
I have noticed low cost PICs (such as OOPic) that are capable of controlling
(and getting useful data out of) devices like the Polaroid sonar rangefinder
and other devices. Is there a benefit in delegating processing tasks such as
this to a secondary micro controller? I am relatively new to C programming
but if you could use these PICs to decode and format the data (perhaps a
string of data sent via serial) it seems you would save processing time
(allowing more resources to be spent on behavior logic). Is there some
pitfall to this idea that I do not see (other than increased complexity)?
Tanks,
Andy Loy
andyl@citlink.net
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
5 Messages in This Thread: ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Is there a benefit in delegating processing tasks? -Matthias Jetleb (16-Feb-01 to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Is there a benefit in delegating processing tasks? -Andrew Loy (16-Feb-01 to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Is there a benefit in delegating processing tasks? -Rainer Balzerowski (16-Feb-01 to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Is there a benefit in delegating processing tasks? -Andrew Loy (16-Feb-01 to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|