To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.handyboardOpen lugnet.robotics.handyboard in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / Handy Board / 8303
8302  |  8304
Subject: 
Re: Is there a benefit in delegating processing tasks?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.handyboard
Date: 
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 03:46:07 GMT
Viewed: 
1032 times
  
Thanks for the insight, I am sorry that I did not mention the main
controller would be a Handyboard (implied though due to the news group).
This is still a good point and has given me a lot to think about.

The slave controller would continue until distance traveled or told to stop
(due to obstacle or a higher priority rule executes). Certainly some good
thinking there, thanks again.

Please more ideas are welcomed and desired.

Andy Loy



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Is there a benefit in delegating processing tasks?
 
(...) Hi Andy, we did it the way you described, but with a 6.270 board (little brother of handy-board). We earned performance on 6.270 with it, because the only thing we had to do is to parse the string received from serial port. We attached a (...) (24 years ago, 16-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Is there a benefit in delegating processing tasks?
 
The advantage of distributed processing is that you can take a sometimes considerable load off the main MCU. Consider a speed regulator: a sensor is needed to continuously monitor the speed at which the wheels are turning and adjustments in motor (...) (24 years ago, 16-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)

5 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR