To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 965
964  |  966
Subject: 
Re: Batteries?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Tue, 1 Dec 1998 23:34:56 GMT
Original-From: 
Tony Firshman <TONY@FIRSHMAN.DEMON.COstopspammers.UK>
Viewed: 
8593 times
  
In article <3.0.3.32.19981201165554.009b8840@mail.tardis.com>, Gary
Hughes <ghughes@tardis.com> writes
> re:  rechargeables
> 
> > (Speculating.)  It may be that the low-battery indicator does not work
> > with rechargables because of the voltage knee.  Typically with
> > rechargables the voltage drops precipitously once you run out of
> > charge.  Lego's concern may be that you'll lose your firmware and
> > programs too easily.  In a situation like that, it's better to
> > categorically warn people not to use them, than to qualify the warning
> > with "unless you don't give a fig if you lose your firmware and
> > programming".
> 
> That is the problem with NiCd rechargeables. By the time the battery
> low detector kicks in, it is often too late. And they have a 'memory' so
> you do want to run them down periodically. They are not recommended
> for the PalmPilot for the same reason.
> 
> Now, I THOUGHT NiMH was not supposed to suffer from these
> problems but I haven't verified this. Some folks claim to have had
> good results with NiMH batteries in the PalmPilot.
Indeed yes - NiMh are much better.  The main problem with them is that
they have a high internal leakage.  They are much worse than NiCads in
this respect. So much so that the electric car racers here have
abandoned them - they lose too much charge even overnight for their
extreme requirements.
> 
> There are also rechargeable alkalines which give you a small number
> of recharges on an otherwise normal alkaline cell.
Yes - they would be a better bet, and give full 1.5v rather than 1.2v
for both Nicad and NiMh.

Mind you a small sealed lead acid battery would be good ballast wouldn't
it (8-)#

--
           QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:252/67) (+44)1442-828255
mailto:tony@firshman.demon.co.uk     http://www.firshman.demon.co.uk
        Voice: (+44)1442-828254      Fax: (+44)1442-828255
      TF Services, 29 Longfield Road, TRING, Herts, HP23 4DG



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Batteries?
 
re: rechargeables (...) That is the problem with NiCd rechargeables. By the time the battery low detector kicks in, it is often too late. And they have a 'memory' so you do want to run them down periodically. They are not recommended for the (...) (28 years ago, 1-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)

7 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR