Subject:
|
Re: What to start out with?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 15 Dec 1999 13:04:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2317 times
|
| |
|
|
I like Dave Baum's book better as a first book. Most people in this group
seem to use NQC which is covered in-depth. Also has lots of construction
ideas and the pictures are a little better.
Mike
Luis Villa <liv@duke.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.SOL.3.91.991215012514.10125D-100000@teer13.acpub.duke.edu...
> On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Hari Wiguna wrote:
> > There are also two books on MindStorms, I'm still reading, so I cannot • make
> > a recommendation yet.
>
> Particularly if you are just starting, and if you are interested in the
> coding more than the construction, I very highly recommend O'Reilly's
> Unofficial Guide to Lego Mindstorms. Covers all your bases and is very
> well written.
>
> Luis
>
> #######################################################################
>
> Profanity is the one language that all programmers understand.
> -Anonymous
>
> #######################################################################
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: What to start out with?
|
| Well, having read both books now, I have to say this: which book you want first depends on what you are looking for. Jonathan's book (the O'Reilly book) is good if you are looking for a survey of all the programming tools available, and a few basic (...) (27 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: What to start out with?
|
| (...) Particularly if you are just starting, and if you are interested in the coding more than the construction, I very highly recommend O'Reilly's Unofficial Guide to Lego Mindstorms. Covers all your bases and is very well written. Luis ###...### (...) (27 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
