 | | Re: show-me training —Pete Hardie
|
| | | (...) This is in fact used for some industrial robots (welders, etc) on assembly lines. It also seems a lot like the motion control camera systems pioneered by ILM for Star Wars. The real problem is that it is difficult to generalize the behaviors - (...) (25 years ago, 8-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: show-me training —Robert Munafo
|
| | | | | (...) Yes, I agree completely. This wasn't meant to be a replacement for real programming -- just a good idea for a kid's toy. It would probably make a great replacement for the Scout's current interface. I think it would be a lot better, in fact, (...) (25 years ago, 8-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: show-me training —Pete Hardie
|
| | | | | | (...) Ah, yes. And it would be a nice feature for behavioral 'subroutines', like collision reaction (on BUMP, steer left and backup) (25 years ago, 8-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: show-me training —Dennis Clark
|
| | | | | | (...) Actually, to be proper for the "Brooksian" subsumption behaviour, it would be behavioural tasks that didn't talk to each other or share state... DLC (25 years ago, 8-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: show-me training —Laurentino Martins
|
| | | | I know that the RCX is the state of the art LEGO computer, but I happen to have a CyberMaster and I noticed all you have said about the Show-me Training (R) applies perfectly to the CyberMaster and much better than the RCX since no extra inputs need (...) (25 years ago, 9-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Cybermaster for show-me training —Robert Munafo
|
| | | | | (...) No "(R)" please! "show-me" is registered six times as a trademark (display stands, restaurant services, spot lights, AV equipment rental, baseball exhibition, and barbeque sauce -- really!) so let's not get any of them upset (-: (...) Does the (...) (25 years ago, 9-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Cybermaster for show-me training —Chris Phillips
|
| | | | | | (...) And let's not forget Missouri, the "Show Me" state: (URL) I've drifted off topic and I can't get up! (25 years ago, 9-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Cybermaster for show-me training & What LEGO should create —Laurentino Martins
|
| | | | | (...) You can see the values change (by pooling) if you rotate the motors by hand, even if there is no program running at all. (...) This can be overcome with a little cheating! ;-D The PC could ask after each step what were the directions the (...) (25 years ago, 9-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: show-me training —Hao-yang Wang
|
| | | | | (...) You can set up the touch sensor so it is pressed when the wheel rolls in one direction but not the other. With two touch sensors to detect the wheel directions, you still have one left for the bumper. (You can squeeze in more sensors by (...) (25 years ago, 10-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: show-me training —Laurentino Martins
|
| | | | (...) How? (...) Yes, the CyberMaster touch sensors are all different from each other. :-) Laurentino Martins [ mailto:lau@mail.telepac.pt ] [ (URL) ] (25 years ago, 10-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: show-me training —Hao-yang Wang
|
| | | | (...) You connect the motor to a differential gear. One end of the differential gear turns the wheel; the other end turns something to press the sensor. Or you suspend the chassis with shock absorbers, then put sensors to detect the direction to (...) (25 years ago, 10-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
