 | | RE: O'Reilly plays coy! —Pedram Amini
|
| | | maybe this will help.... (URL) Message----- From: Russell Nelson [mailto:nelson@crynwr.com] Sent: Friday, July 30, 1999 4:08 PM To: lego-robotics@crynwr.com Subject: O'Reilly plays coy! ARRRGGGGHHHHH!!!!!! I just got my review copy of the O'Reilly (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: O'Reilly plays coy! —Pete Hardie
|
| | | | | (...) "What's up, tock?" (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | O'Reilly book cover (was: O'Reilly plays coy!) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) --Todd (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: O'Reilly book cover (was: O'Reilly plays coy!) —Martin Erdelen
|
| | | | | | (...) should've been a termite, though: builds like LEGO, thinks like RCX... Greetings, Martin E. (zoologist) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: O'Reilly book cover (was: O'Reilly plays coy!) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) ...tastes like? --Todd (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: O'Reilly book cover (was: O'Reilly plays coy!) —Martin Erdelen
|
| | | | | | (...) I've heard the larvae are quite good (esp. if roasted, sort of TV snack), but I have not tried myself. We have only ants up here in Finland - not nourishing enough... (Also, _they_ have tried to eat _me_, butdidn't reveal if they liked the (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | output A in reverse weak and NQC question —Tim Gion
|
| | | | I just picked up Mindstorms on Thursday. Today, I noticed that output A in reverse is significantly weaker running a motor than it is running the motor forward. I've tried this with more than one motor and also compared it to that of output C. Is (...) (25 years ago, 1-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: output A in reverse weak and NQC question —Dave Baum
|
| | | | In article (...) I can take a look at the problem if you try downloading the program in verbose mode by using the -v option... nqc -v -d foo.nqc and send me (dbaum@enteract.com) the output. That should at least tell me where the communication is (...) (25 years ago, 1-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: output A in reverse weak and NQC question —Tim Gion
|
| | | | I did some more experimenting today and it turns out that output A is weak in reverse, normal in forward and output B behaves in the opposite manner. It looks like output C is the only one that performs fine in both directions. Has any one else run (...) (25 years ago, 1-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: output A in reverse weak and NQC question —Soh Chio Siong
|
| | | | It may not even be an RCX problem. I've found that all my Lego motors run better in one direction than the other. Has got to do with the magnetisation of the pole pieces, I believe. Try checking out by connecting the motors directly to the Lego 9V (...) (25 years ago, 2-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
