Subject:
|
Re: Motor Sensor (fwd)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 9 Jun 1999 19:13:24 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Peter Hesketh <pbh@phesk#nomorespam#.demon.co.uk>
|
Viewed:
|
1172 times
|
| |
|
|
In article <199906091214.HAA00300@einstein.ssz.com>, Jim Choate
<ravage@ssz.com> writes
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Kekoa Proudfoot -----
>
> Subject: Re: Motor Sensor (fwd)
> Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 01:56:23 GMT
>
> > It's actualy not velocity, it's angular accelleration.
>
> It's actually not angular acceleration, it's angular velocity.
>
> ----- End of forwarded message from Kekoa Proudfoot -----
>
> Can't be dude. Re-read your basic mechanics. For *any* object to go in a
> circle it's 'accelleration', otherwise there is no way to take into account
> the change in vector of the velocity vector which is always chaning
> (precessing in a circle). Last time I checked anytime a velocity vector
> changed that was an accelleration (dv/dt).
Sorry, but it is _linear_ acceleration which makes things go in circles.
They then go in circles with constant angular velocity. Angular
acceleration is when dtheta/dt is changing.
Never underestimate the stupidity of some of the people we have to deal
with.
--
Regards - Peter Hesketh, Mynyddbach, Mon.
"Un petit d'un petit
"S'etonne aux Halles.
"Un petit d'un petit
"Ah! Degres te fallent..."
(from "Mots d'heures: Gousses, Rames."
Luis d'Antin van Rooten)
--
Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Motor Sensor (fwd)
|
| ----- Forwarded message from Kekoa Proudfoot ----- Subject: Re: Motor Sensor (fwd) Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 01:56:23 GMT (...) It's actually not angular acceleration, it's angular velocity. ----- End of forwarded message from Kekoa Proudfoot ----- (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
