To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 4752
4751  |  4753
Subject: 
Re: Lego Network Protocol questions
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Sat, 1 May 1999 00:49:08 GMT
Viewed: 
295 times
  
Dave Baum <dbaum@spambgoneenteract.com> wrote:
In article <FB0GKF.3s@lugnet.com>, "Mike Moran" <mm@ee.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
- In general, I was wondering what the low-level protocol details were,
  apart from the frame/segment details that I have seen?

Transmit whenever you feel like it and hope you didn't obliterate data
coming from the other direction.  Rudimentary, but still quite effective
given the typical use pattern with is host driven command/response.  With
RCX to RCX communication you're just taking chances on missing stuff
unless you implement a specific master/slave relationship on top of the
basic messages.

Dave, did you catch the crosspost from lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos?  I think
there were details discussed there that may or may not have amounted to a
fairly specific proposal for a protocol for LegOS.  Anybody care to
summarize whatever was decided?  I'd be interested in hearing also, I
skipped a lot of the discussion.  Specifically, I would like to find out
what was decided about the underlying packet format, down to the 55ff00s of
the protocol.

Regarding Mike's questions and ideas, I thought I'd share some thoughts
I've had about serial protocols for the RCX.

- Since the RCX receives its own echo, you can detect collisions by
  checking to see if the echo matches the transmission; the caveat is that
  echos aren't reliable if the IR link has been inactive for a few seconds.

- You can avoid collisions to some extent by holding off transmission if
  you are currently receiving data.  You might be able to use larger
  segment sizes than you would otherwise expect if you make use of this.
  The right segment size can only be determined by experiment, I think.
  A #define is in order.

- I would argue against using a "slotted" protocol unless you expect all
  RCXs to be in IR proximity of one another and you expect them all to be
  talking a lot of the time.  I don't know how often this would be the
  case.

Mike, regarding synchronization for a slotted protocol, what did you mean
by embedding that in "the wire-line signal"?  Do you mean a physical wire,
or the IR protocol?

-Kekoa



Message has 3 Replies:
  RE: Lego Network Protocol questions
 
With all of the talk about networking and IP embedding and such, and since I'm working on a proprietary '485 master/slave protocol for a client, I had to dust off a GREAT university text on networks. It devotes an entire chapter to ALOHA and slotted (...) (26 years ago, 1-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics)
  Re: Lego Network Protocol questions
 
(...) Oops, I must've just caught the tail end of the conversation. I assumed the standard [lame] lego protocol was being discussed, not a custom protocol. Sorry. Dave (26 years ago, 2-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics)
  Re: Lego Network Protocol questions
 
(...) Just to state my interests: I'm mainly interested in the protocol, eg what level of service it would provide etc. In particular, I'm interested in layering a higher level gauranteed delivery protocol atop whatever simple one is provided. (...) (...) (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lego Network Protocol questions
 
(...) Transmit whenever you feel like it and hope you didn't obliterate data coming from the other direction. Rudimentary, but still quite effective given the typical use pattern with is host driven command/response. With RCX to RCX communication (...) (26 years ago, 30-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics)

15 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    
Active threads in Robotics

 
Verified and Trusted Team of Hackers
22 hours ago
Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR