Subject:
|
Re: Og Needs More Inputs (fwd)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 28 Apr 1999 21:24:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1088 times
|
| |
|
|
Michael Gasperi <gasperi@alynk.com> wrote:
> Let's assume it is the LEGO rotation sensor. Which is not an 8-bit
> sensor. It is an incremental encoder that sends values back as 4 analog
> values. If a touch sensor is put in parallel with a rotation sensor the
> analog values would get messed up and the RCX will not see movement or
> maybe even false movement.
To add to this, the effect of placing a touch sensor in parallel with a
rotation sensor is as follows:
When touch sensor is not pressed, rotation sensor works fine
When touch sensor is pressed repeatedly, rotation sensor drifts
When touch sensor is held down, rotation sensor does not measure rotation
I tried this before I posted (in another message) my thoughts on this
topic.
-Kekoa
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Og Needs More Inputs (fwd)
|
| (...) connected (...) Let's assume it is the LEGO rotation sensor. Which is not an 8-bit sensor. It is an incremental encoder that sends values back as 4 analog values. If a touch sensor is put in parallel with a rotation sensor the analog values (...) (25 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
