Subject:
|
Re: Og Needs More Inputs (fwd)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 28 Apr 1999 12:52:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
921 times
|
| |
|
|
> ----- Forwarded message from Michael Gasperi -----
> There isn't any way to "double up" a rotation sensor. It needs to be • connected
> 100% of the time to prevent it from missing counts.
>
> ----- End of forwarded message from Michael Gasperi -----
>
> I'm not sure that's accurate. Let's assume a 8-bit rotation sensor.
Let's assume it is the LEGO rotation sensor. Which is not an 8-bit sensor. It
is an incremental encoder that sends values back as 4 analog values. If a
touch sensor is put in parallel with a rotation sensor the analog values would
get messed up and the RCX will not see movement or maybe even false movement.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Og Needs More Inputs (fwd)
|
| (...) To add to this, the effect of placing a touch sensor in parallel with a rotation sensor is as follows: When touch sensor is not pressed, rotation sensor works fine When touch sensor is pressed repeatedly, rotation sensor drifts When touch (...) (25 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Og Needs More Inputs (fwd)
|
| ----- Forwarded message from Michael Gasperi ----- From: "Michael Gasperi" <gasperi@alynk.com> Subject: Re: Og Needs More Inputs Posted-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 20:57:31 GMT Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 20:57:31 GMT Organization: Alynk Message-ID: (...) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
