 | | RE: proximity detection
|
| Don't be bashful. Post it to the list! I'm sure I'm not the only one collecting variations on this theme. Wayne W. Schott schott@netwurx.net Eagle, WI, USA ---...--- From: John Cooper[SMTP:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, February 18, 1999 5:07 AM (...) (25 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: proximity detection
|
| (...) Well, I'm wary of clogging up the list with reams of stuff which is useful only to a minority. If it were an NQC list then I'd do it. One day I'll get round to a LEGO section on my web site, but I'm up to my ears in paying work at the moment. (...) (25 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: proximity detection
|
| (...) You could post it to the new NQC list/group, which is now up & running. For info on subscribing: (URL) One day I'll get round to a LEGO (...) Here it is: (URL) of this message is meta-discussion...] (...) The crynwr.com server doesn't? Or the (...) (25 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Meta discussion [Was: Re: proximity detection]
|
| (...) post it when I do. (...) I have not had any copies of my messages back from lego-robotics@crynwr.com, apart from the one my software sends to me automatically (I still have to check to see if it is dropping the real messages because they are (...) (25 years ago, 22-Feb-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
