Subject:
|
Meta discussion [Was: Re: proximity detection]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Feb 1999 22:54:16 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
John Cooper <robots@{ihatespam}jpsc.co.uk>
|
Reply-To:
|
ROBOTS@JPSC.CO.antispamUK
|
Viewed:
|
1315 times
|
| |
|
|
> You could post it to the new NQC list/group, which is now up & running.
> For info on subscribing:
>
> http://www.lugnet.com/news/display.cgi/display.cgi?lugnet.announce:184
I have now joined a couple of the discussion groups, but haven't had any mail yet - I'll
post it when I do.
> [remainder of this message is meta-discussion...]
>
>
> > because the server doesn't copy messages back to me (I wonder if I can change
> > that?).
>
> The crynwr.com server doesn't? Or the lugnet.com server doesn't? AFAIK, both
> send copies of messages out to everyone on the distribution list (including the
> original sender), but they don't echo copies back to each other (or else there
> would be an infinite mail loop).
I have not had any copies of my messages back from lego-robotics@crynwr.com, apart from
the one my software sends to me automatically (I still have to check to see if it is
dropping the real messages because they are duplicates).
> Anyway, I figured out why 5 of your messages didn't make it into newsgroup
> immediately immediately upon being received. (Only messages from you were
> causing a problem, BTW -- not any messages from other people...makes ya feel
> extra special, huh? :)
.
.
> Now that's one behemoth regex. It looks valid, but it has a small bugaboo:
> In addition to catching mails from most mailer-daemons, I believe it's also
> matching the following header in your messages:
>
> X-Envelope-From: postmaster@jpsc.co.uk
>
> Maybe it's a bugaboo in the regex for thinking that 'postmaster' is always a
> server-generated poo-poo message, or maybe 'postmaster' technically shouldn't
> be appearing in X-Envelope-From on your messages...I'm not an SMTP guru so
As far as I know there isn't any technical restriction on anything appearing in an X
header.
> I'm not sure. I'll have to figure out a workaround regardless.
Let me know if you can't and I'll see if I can post via a different method.
> In the meantime, I've been sending your messages through the newsgroup gateway
> by hand, so they've showed up a bit late, but rest assured that they haven't
> been lost.
Thanks
--
John & James Cooper, Wallington, UK
--
Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: proximity detection
|
| (...) You could post it to the new NQC list/group, which is now up & running. For info on subscribing: (URL) One day I'll get round to a LEGO (...) Here it is: (URL) of this message is meta-discussion...] (...) The crynwr.com server doesn't? Or the (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
