To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 27901
27900  |  27902
Subject: 
Re: Train motors comparison
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Wed, 1 Sep 2010 19:21:35 GMT
Viewed: 
5141 times
  
In lugnet.trains, John Neal wrote:
   In lugnet.announce, Philippe Hurbain wrote:
   The 9V, RC and Power Functions train motors compete around a track under close scrutiny of an on-board NXT...

Complete test results here.

Okay, this is awesome work, Philippe, to see the comparison of the new PF motor vs the 9 volt motor. As an eight wider, I always lamented the underpowered 9 volt motor in its attempts to pull heavy, 8 wide consists. But it wasn’t such an issue because one could always just add more motors. There certainly were, however, diminished returns in terms of track voltage. We at the TCLTC used souped up speed controllers, but that still didn’t solve the problem of overheated, over-worked 9 volt motors.

Though I would never switch to the new track, I would consider retooling with these superior motors.

I haven’t even checked to see if these are available yet on US SAH.

In any event, thanks for posting!

JOHN

Ditto, except 6 wide.

Thanks, Phillipe.

Ed



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Train motors comparison
 
(...) Okay, this is awesome work, Philippe, to see the comparison of the new PF motor vs the 9 volt motor. As an eight wider, I always lamented the underpowered 9 volt motor in its attempts to pull heavy, 8 wide consists. But it wasn't such an issue (...) (14 years ago, 1-Sep-10, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics, FTX)

7 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR