 | | Re: unsubscribing?
|
|
Ben, It appears you are on the crynwr list, which is maintained seperately from Lugnet. Roc appears to be directly on Lugnet. Roc - If you really have huge problems unsubscribing, post to lugnet.admin and ask Suz for help. Ben - I recommend first (...) (19 years ago, 24-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: unsubscribing?
|
|
This is very painful: impossible. I tried, had to give up, and so had to resort to automatically dump these in my junk mail. How awesome and inspiring this mail group might be for some, it has turned into a hassle for me (and now also for you I am (...) (19 years ago, 23-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: unsubscribing?
|
|
(...) First thing is that this should probably have been posted to lugnet.admin or .offtopic if at all. You need to go to the (URL) website, and then click on "newsgroups", under this, select "News by mail". You will need your email address and a (...) (19 years ago, 23-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Pictures of the NXT hardware
|
|
Hi, today I opened up a new NXT from the US and made some photographs: (URL) Jürgen Stuber <juergen@jstuber.net> (URL) key fingerprint = 2767 CA3C 5680 58BA 9A91 23D9 BED6 9A7A AF9E 68B4 (19 years ago, 23-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Flex system hose
|
|
(...) I had a look at the 1/8" plastic tubing in model railway shops and stalls at shows. I think it's ABS or polystyrene. I have no issues with cutting the tubes either :-) but I don't like painting stuff used as or with LEGO bricks. I think the (...) (19 years ago, 23-Jul-06, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | unsubscribing?
|
|
sorry to post this here, but i really cant find an answer online how do i unsubscribe form the lugnet robotics list? r (19 years ago, 23-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Almost 300! And another Mindstorms Challenge! And more!
|
|
OK. Let's start over again: What I should have said is that I believe that if you have two vehicles each weighing 2 lbs (the maximum allowed by the rules), one rolling, one "walking", the probablity of making a "stronger" forwardly mobile unit is (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Almost 300! And another Mindstorms Challenge! And more!
|
|
(...) I see a high amount of torque required on the Lego motors also. In general, and if done poorly, all you have is a bot with a stalled motor for one minute running at full power. Clutch gears could help, but it would have to be done in such a (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Almost 300! And another Mindstorms Challenge! And more!
|
|
(...) So you have (in essence) a walking robot - but you wouldn't want to halve your traction by having only half of your feet on the ground at any one time - you'd want to have a robot with LOTS of feet and pick up just some tiny fraction of them (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Almost 300! And another Mindstorms Challenge! And more!
|
|
I read the entire thread, and the rules and ask the question: Why must it ROLL at all? If friction is the name of the game, and if the wheels (tires) are the parts that have the "stickiest" qualities, then why not maximize the surface area of those. (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
