 | | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
|
(...) Sounds like it's a firmware block though, so hopefully it can be overcome with "NxtOS" or whatever in future. ROSCO (19 years ago, 11-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: A Beautiful Machine prototype and perhaps a challenge/idea
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) <snip> It is slightly more complicated than that. In order to make it go up slow enough to be interesting, I had to gear down the speed of the motor. As such I go from 8 teeth (I think) on the motor to the big 40 (?) teeth on the (...) (19 years ago, 11-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: A Beautiful Machine prototype and perhaps a challenge/idea
|
|
(...) Very interesting, if a rather disturbing implementation. I had heard of the conecpt, but not seen those vids. The prosthetic is just a big creepy. (...) I like your version, first its more cute and friendly, and secondly you can see the (...) (19 years ago, 11-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | A Beautiful Machine prototype and perhaps a challenge/idea
|
|
Computer scientists might know of Claude E. Shannon, considered the father of digital communication. He is also less well known for his Most Beautiful Machine, a machine that, when turned on, simply turns itself off. (A version can be viewed online (...) (19 years ago, 11-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
|
(...) Hmmm... Speaking of SDK, based on a preliminary version of the Hardware SDK documentation the NXT is not capable of being both a master and a slave at the same time so a network of NXTs is limited to one master and three slaves and that's it. (...) (19 years ago, 11-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
