 | | Re: NXT to NXT communication? —John Hansen
|
| | | (...) I am not certain but I believe that the NXT does not allow direct slave-slave communication. An NXT can be both a master and a slave in a hierarchical array of NXTs (to the best of my knowledge) but two slave NXTs cannot directly communicate (...) (19 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: NXT to NXT communication? —Benton Jackson
|
| | | | | (...) So, if any NXT can be both master and slave, could you hook 3 of them up in a triangle? A is master over B, B over C, and C over A? (19 years ago, 5-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: NXT to NXT communication? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | (...) Or even A master over B, B over A? ROSCO (19 years ago, 5-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: NXT to NXT communication? —David Hurley
|
| | | | (...) OK...it looks like this messaging mechanism in (URL) is a little confusing. Steve cleared this up a bit in (URL) In the hierarchy he discussed, N0 has to go through N1 to talk to N2-4. This model can be extended to higher levels in a tree (...) (19 years ago, 5-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
