 | | Re: So, who IS in the MDP? —Tim Byrne
|
| | | (...) It is true that email is not a "foolproof" way of communicating, but it is not as fallible as you portray. And 9000 is far from "high volume" email. At least if you're talking about a company communicating with its customers. I work for a (...) (18 years ago, 8-Mar-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: So, who IS in the MDP? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) Of course it's also possible that LEGO still have got yay or nay from the first 100 respondants, and so sending out bummer emails may be premature. ROSCO (18 years ago, 8-Mar-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: So, who IS in the MDP? —Tim Byrne
|
| | | | | | (...) Since I haven't gotten my email yet, I'll subscribe to that wishful thinking :D -Tim (18 years ago, 9-Mar-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: So, who IS in the MDP? —Benton Jackson
|
| | | | (...) I got a bummer email. (18 years ago, 9-Mar-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: So, who IS in the MDP? —Alexander Sack
|
| | | | (...) How long ago? Btw, I think I've finally given up hope. I was thinking that perhaps the folks that didn't get bummer emails were reserves for folks who couldn't initially accept OR if they were going to expand the MDP a little bit after the (...) (18 years ago, 9-Mar-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: So, who IS in the MDP? —Benton Jackson
|
| | | | (...) Feb 28th, 4 in the afternoon. I haven't signed anything, so I'm pretty sure I'm OK posting this: ---...--- Dear LEGO fan, Thank you very much for your interest in participating in the LEGO® MINDSTORMS™ Developer Program. We are very sorry but (...) (18 years ago, 9-Mar-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: So, who IS in the MDP? —Benton Jackson
|
| | | | (...) <snip> By the way, the "from" address: LEGO Do-Not-Reply Mailbox [do-not-reply@america.lego.com] (18 years ago, 9-Mar-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
