 | | Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms —John Hansen
|
| | | (...) Linux isn't a language. It's an operating system. And nobody I know uses Linux without a graphical user interface. And nobody I know programs in text-based languages at a OS command prompt using VI. Do people write posts to Lugnet by dragging (...) (18 years ago, 25-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) Ahem, I'm using debian right now as a server, and haven't even installed a graphical interface on it. And yes, I regularly have to go delve into config files etc with vi. (...) In fact I did exactly that with LegOS (as it was then) and NQC for (...) (18 years ago, 25-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms —Tim Byrne
|
| | | | | (...) Hey! I use Linux every day and I don't use X as a GUI. And I program 8 hours a day all within vi. I will admit that I may not be the typical mindstorms programmer. In the end it really comes down to what folks are most comfortable with. In my (...) (18 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms —Steve Hassenplug
|
| | | | (...) Version 3.3.7.10 (2005-10-05) Version 3.3.7.7 Version 3.3.7.6 (2003-10-27) Version 3.3.7.5 (2003-05-22) Version 3.3.7.4 (2003-03-24) Version 3.3.7.3 (2003-03-07) Version 3.3.7.2 (2003-02-12) Version 3.3.7.1 (2003-01-16) Version 3.3.6.6 (...) (18 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms —Claude Baumann
|
| | | | (...) ...snip... (...) Steve, I totally agree with you. A few remarks: 1. There doesn't exist any non-buggy programming language. 2. There doesn't exist any best language. The reason that different languages exist is that there are different people (...) (18 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
