 | | Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms —T. Alexander Popiel
|
| | | (...) Because different people want mutually contradictory things. For my own usage, there are times when I want a very procedural language where I can easily specify the precise sequence that things happen in at incredibly fine level of detail (...) (18 years ago, 23-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms —Steve Lane
|
| | | | (...) I'd like my NXT to be self aware, straight out of the box. Am I asking too much? :-) Steve (18 years ago, 23-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | | (...) Mammals don't even come like that. LOL! (...) Kev (18 years ago, 23-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms —T. Alexander Popiel
|
| | | | (...) I don't think you're asking too much. Just be warned that self aware robots tend to be depressed. Just look at Marvin from Hitchhiker's. Oh, and C3PO seems to be bipolar. :-P - Alex (18 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms —Benton Jackson
|
| | | | (...) Let's not forget about HAL! (18 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
