To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 24686
24685  |  24687
Subject: 
Re: New contest
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Wed, 7 Dec 2005 18:19:09 GMT
Original-From: 
Mr S <szinn_the1@yahoo^Spamless^.com>
Viewed: 
4562 times
  
Peter,
Yes, the silence was pretty loud on this. Oh well.
Whether anyone else attempts it, I'm going to.

I'll agree that rule 5 is made optional: fully
self-contained autonomous operation gains extra
points, but tethered (by any means, copper, IR, RF
etc.) is an accepted configuration.

Item 7 points are for extra credit rather than hard
requirements.

Yes, this will be my goal for next year, competition
or not, including don't get stuck in the kitchen
table/chair legs etc. My goal is to navigate all
'typical' household obstacles expertly. We'll see how
it works out :)

Optimism is a great starting point for a project

Cheers

--- PeterBalch <PeterBalch@compuserve.com> wrote:

> Message text written by Mr S
> 
> > So, in the interests of those of us who are
> > interested, I suggest that we all compete in a new
> > contest,
> > and goal of the first contest is simple:
> > "Don't get stuck behind the couch"
> > What do you think about such an 'event'?
> > Is it worth doing?
> 
> Hmm, your suggestion seems to have been met with a
> deafening silence.
> 
> Does eveyone think it's too hard? Too easy?
> Pointless?
> 
> > 5 - Your robot must be autonomous,
> > not permissable to link your robot
> > to another pc
> 
> I'm not sure this rule is neccessary but it does
> little harm. I expect that
> most of the "Don't get stuck" algorithms won't need
> tremendous computing
> power. But if someone solves the coms problems and
> comes up with a
> wonderful algorithm that involves taking bearings
> off the ceiling lights
> and building a 3D model of the room then well done.
> 
> And I think the "human interaction" parts are
> superfluous and may distract
> from the "Don't get stuck behind the couch" aspect.
> If the robot discourses
> at length about the merits of cubism but only drives
> around in little
> circles in a big open space then it shouldn't  score
> highly for not getting
> stuck.
> 
> Otherwise I think all your suggested rules are good.
> 
> Peter





__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com



Message is in Reply To:
  New contest
 
Message text written by Mr S (...) Hmm, your suggestion seems to have been met with a deafening silence. Does eveyone think it's too hard? Too easy? Pointless? (...) I'm not sure this rule is neccessary but it does little harm. I expect that most (...) (21 years ago, 7-Dec-05, to lugnet.robotics)

6 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR