Subject:
|
Re: Barcodes & error detection
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 8 Sep 2005 07:01:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1082 times
|
| |
|
|
Hello Brian,
Error correction is good, but no error is probably better...
> It turns out the errors seem to only be of the form of a '1' (black)
> mistakenly read as a '0' (white).
This may be caused by specular reflexion on a too shiny black stripe. We had
that problem during the Billund AFOL mindstorms competition, it was solved by
tilting the light sensor...
Philo
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Barcodes & error detection
|
| (...) Absolutely, but in any real world application there is almost always some error rate. (...) John Barnes also suggested that to me after I posted, and I'm embarassed to admit that the thought hadn't occured to me. I need to test (again), but (...) (19 years ago, 8-Sep-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Barcodes & error detection
|
| Some of you at BrickFest may have seen Gus, a small robotic forklift that was one of my GBC modules. Gus had two problems at BrickFest. First, while the codereading task was 98% accurate, that still means on average once every 16 circuits of the (...) (19 years ago, 7-Sep-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
