To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 23679
23678  |  23680
Subject: 
AFOL/Mindstorms stagnation (Was Re: FLL not allowing NQC)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Sun, 13 Mar 2005 03:49:33 GMT
Original-From: 
Steve Baker <sjbaker1@IHATESPAMairmail.net>
Viewed: 
1323 times
  
Mr S wrote:
In lugnet.robotics, Dick Swan wrote:

Mindstorms for the AFOL and consumer market appears
totally stagnant.

I am curious. I don't know about other AFOLs on this
list, but I have not found anything on the LEGO sites
that I want to buy? I already have 4 RIS 2.0 systems
and some other parts I bought off of eBay/Bricklink.

I think that it's possible that the market has simply
saturated.

After all, there is a definite limit to the amount of
Lego parts you need to build robots that are as complex
as your time/imagination allows.  I also have 4 RIS
and a handful of the other Scout-based systems.  With
some additional sensors and about 50lbs of bulk/unsorted
Lego from eBay and I really don't *need* any more Lego.

The guys who build Lego Railroad, or do massive sculptures
can quite literally never have enough - but with Mindstorms,
the sheer power-to-weight issues limit the amount of Lego
a typical AFOL might need.

So it's possible that we simply all have all the Lego we
need - except for the occasional really specialised things
(like suddenly needing hundreds of chain links and soccer
balls for the GBC - or a ton of pneumatics so you can
play with pnuematic computers.

But I'd be suprised that this would be enough to keep
the Mindstorm division of Lego afloat.

IMHO, if LEGO were to offer piece parts with a minimum
order dollar value, after six months or so, they would
have a good idea of what part 'kits' they could sell
to the AFOL market.

Maybe - but are there REALLY enough people willing to buy
a huge bag of chainlinks to justify the effort of putting
them in boxes - versus churning out another Bionicle or
StarWars set?

Presumably not - or they'd be doing it.

---------------------------- Steve Baker -------------------------
HomeEmail: <sjbaker1@airmail.net>    WorkEmail: <sjbaker@link.com>
HomePage : http://www.sjbaker.org
Projects : http://plib.sf.net    http://tuxaqfh.sf.net
            http://tuxkart.sf.net http://prettypoly.sf.net
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
GCS d-- s:+ a+ C++++$ UL+++$ P--- L++++$ E--- W+++ N o+ K? w--- !O M-
V-- PS++ PE- Y-- PGP-- t+ 5 X R+++ tv b++ DI++ D G+ e++ h--(-) r+++ y++++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: AFOL/Mindstorms stagnation (Was Re: FLL not allowing NQC)
 
(...) That's right - I find that for Mindstorms the stuff I have matches the time I have, but brickscaping for trains takes vast quantities of bricks - at least they're basic bricks! To improve the power to weight ratio you could make a power (...) (20 years ago, 13-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: FLL not allowing NQC
 
(...) I am curious. I don't know about other AFOLs on this list, but I have not found anything on the LEGO sites that I want to buy? I already have 4 RIS 2.0 systems and some other parts I bought off of eBay/Bricklink. I bought the additional pieces (...) (20 years ago, 13-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)

5 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR