 | | Re: why doesn't this work?
|
|
(...) That doesn't totally seem right. I would think it would slow, before stoping. One last thing to try is actually storing sensor value in the array. Also, in the Checkvar function, it looks like the line: if(temp<27) temp=0; should say (...) (20 years ago, 1-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | That doesn't totally seem right.
|
|
(...) That occured to me after my last posting, but I can't think why it wouldn't slow. (...) Yes, your right. I've switched to the 10x Swan firmware, and stored the results in the datalog. Here they are Variable 4: 4 Variable 4: 0 Variable 4: 3 (...) (20 years ago, 1-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: That doesn't totally seem right.
|
|
(...) If you're storing this all in the datalog, you should be able to go much farther than 27 times through the loop. Try storing a couple hundred values (how big is the datalog?) Then, you should see the time-between-changes get bigger. Also, it (...) (20 years ago, 1-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: That doesn't totally seem right.
|
|
(...) The datalog was 27 but is now 100 (I was pushed for time earlier). (...) That's exactly what happens now. (...) I can now see that the zero's fade over time. Here's the latest results. Variable 4: 1 Variable 4: 5 Variable 4: 0 Variable 4: 4 (...) (20 years ago, 1-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
