To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 22968
22967  |  22969
Subject: 
Re: SPAM and OT messages
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general
Followup-To: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Tue, 2 Nov 2004 21:48:14 GMT
Viewed: 
1646 times
  
In lugnet.robotics, Mr S <szinn_the1@yahoo.com> wrote:

It seems to me that no matter how hard we try, without
dedicated real time human attention and filtering,
some spam and OT messages will eventually make it to
the list.

It is certainly true that there is a considerable level of effort required to
ensure an open access mailing list is free of spam.

The intelligent thing to do is not overreact, but
simply forward to the list moderator so that it gets
to their attention to censure the user or whatever
methods are employed. Complaining about it never helps
anything.

I didn't see any complaints about the specific messages. I saw a question as to
why there is a linkage between the list and lugnet.robotics.

If you are seriously concerned and can volunteer as
much as several hours of your day to sit and moderate
messages on the list in real time, then you can do
something about it, otherwise, be patient, and calm.

Moderation is certainly effective as a way to reduce spam on open lists. But
that level of effort is not at all required for LUGNET since it is,
fundamentally, not an open mailing list or collection of them.

So, therefore, while your point is completely valid when referring to open
lists, another, much simpler, alternative, is to sever the link between the
mailing list and lugnet.robotics. Most of the spam and OT complaints come from
LUGNET readers who are accustomed to a different sort of environment than an
open mailing list provides.

While there are many academic and scientific teams
working to create the worlds best spam trap, they
haven't done it yet... so demanding better performance
from a free list is just out of order in my view.

This in fact is not what is being suggested by the LUGNET reader that posted the
question about why the link exists.

I saw no demand that list administrators do anything additional beyond what they
have been doing. So therefore I would in turn say that your statement that
anyone is actually "demanding better performance" might possibly be misplaced.

Hope that helps.

++Lar



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: SPAM and OT messages
 
It seems to me that no matter how hard we try, without dedicated real time human attention and filtering, some spam and OT messages will eventually make it to the list. The intelligent thing to do is not overreact, but simply forward to the list (...) (20 years ago, 2-Nov-04, to lugnet.robotics)

13 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    
Active threads in Robotics

 
Verified and Trusted Team of Hackers
6 hours ago
Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR