 | | Re: RCX 1.0 without external power jack? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | (...) Ooops my bad... Yes they are marked 2.0. Has anyone checked whether they are any different to the 1.0 from the 1.5 set? ROSCO (21 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: RCX 1.0 without external power jack? —Scott Lyttle
|
| | | | | (...) The Lego outlet at Dawsonville might have some 9709's available--yep, the one's with the jack. I think they are currently 59.95 or 69.95. If anybody wants some and is going to Brickfest PDX, you can do a phone order for the RCX (so you can buy (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: RCX 1.0 without external power jack? —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | | (...) Apart from supply jack in 1.0 and 2.0 marking on 2.0, there are some PCB differences, see board scans here: (URL) 2.0 brick uses a 76kHz IR receiver chip to get better compatibility with Spybots/Manas but much lower sensitivity between RCX to (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RCX 1.0 without external power jack? —Paul Britton
|
| | | | (...) It looks like there isn't as much output drive protection on the RCX2.0 PCBs, unless the MLX10402CB parts have more internal protection than the ELEX 10402As. Does anyone know of any information available about this? I will say now that I (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RCX 1.0 without external power jack? —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | | (...) Yes, there is a current limitation in driver. See this curve ((URL) and driver datasheet ((URL) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
