Subject:
|
Re: Legway and Robolab
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 Dec 2003 18:45:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1036 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
>
> I'm not going to say it can't be done, and I'd love to see the code (and so
> would everyone else), if you (or anyone does) get it to work, but it may be
> tough.
>
> Good luck
> Steve
I spent a couple of evenings with a Legway, EOPD sensors and Robolab. I could
not get it to balance or reach any condition of stability. I eventually 'gave
up' because I felt that the violent control actions would destroy my motors :)
Steve, you warned me ...!!
Jerry
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Legway and Robolab
|
| (...) Apparently, the standard firmware imposes a 100ms delay before a motor can change directions (ostensibly to protect the motors). This might be the source of some of the instability. Dick Swan suggests a possible way around the delay at the (...) (21 years ago, 10-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Legway and Robolab
|
| (...) While I agree this sounds like a fun project, don't be too disapointed if things don't go as well as you hope. I did some testing with NQC, and I found the standard firmware to be too slow to balance a Legway. I'm not going to say it can't be (...) (21 years ago, 8-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
