 | | Re: RIS 3.0 —Andrew Keyser
|
| | | Now that is freaking awesome - but do they supply the same amount of torque as the 'standard' ones do? Also, that gearbox 2, looks nice and all, might come in handy, but I prefer having more control over my placment of gears. I think it would be (...) (21 years ago, 22-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: RIS 3.0 —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | | SNIP (...) They did make a clear touch sensor. Well, clear light blue. It came in the Cybermaster sets... (URL) - who just wants more inputs and outputs on his RCX 3.0. Oh, and a power jack, and rf (instead of ir), a wireless cam, and new sensors. (...) (21 years ago, 22-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: RIS 3.0 —Mark Riley
|
| | | | | | (...) power (...) What baffles me is why Lego never made a rotation sensor based on a potentiometer. It would be low cost (since it is passive) and offer much better resolution than the current rotation sensor for applications requiring <270 degrees (...) (21 years ago, 22-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: RIS 3.0 —Tim Auton
|
| | | | | | | (...) I think there was one for the DACTA sets. It's easy to make your own though. Tim (21 years ago, 22-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: RIS 3.0 —Paul Kleniewski
|
| | | | | | "Mark Riley" <markril@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:HK05nw.1Lnu@lugnet.com... (...) rot sensor based on potentiometer can wear out but active mouse ball - like sensor will never loos it's parameters that's why i think they made that br pixel (21 years ago, 26-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: RIS 3.0 —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | | | (...) Actually they provide more mechanical power than standard RIS motor, at the price of an increased consumption (almost doubled). More info soon in my motor comparison page ;o) Philo www.philohome.com (21 years ago, 22-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: RIS 3.0 —Dan Lauber
|
| | | | I think gear blocks like that would be awesome. So long as they still follow standard lego units, they probably convey a lot of advantages over the standard gears. They can probably handle a boatload more torque, great for robots, especially arms, (...) (21 years ago, 23-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
