To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 20537
20536  |  20538
Subject: 
Re: baby walker
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 08:26:49 GMT
Viewed: 
218 times
  
In lugnet.technic, Philippe Hurbain writes:
Very cool!

Thanks for trying out the design for me, I would have worked on it myself,
but I'm glad you could help me out. I'm wondering, did the design with 7
pieces get its foot totally off the ground?
Actually no, the double bent liftarm has no point where it balances perfectly.

I think lego is actually making
a two-long liftarm now, but I used the closest thing I had.
yes, http://peeron.com/inv/parts/43857 (but I've none yet!)

I'm also
wondering if it would be okay with you if I used some of your pictures for
my gallery at brickshelf, since I can't take any right now.

Sure you can !!!


I was just thinking about the design and that I would really like to have it
lift its foot off the ground, and I think I have something. I think that a
1x7 liftarm with an 18 long flex tube would be a touch smaller and allow the
foot to clear the ground. The diameter of the flex tube is slightly smaller
than the flexible axle and I don't think the motor would bump it. Please let
me know if it works, and I don't mean to bother you.

Yes it works, but to rise the foot completely you have to add the bottom
motor part. I had a completely lifting foot using the 5 pieces design by
replacing the flex axle with a 29L flex tube (thats a bigfoot!!!), the added
weight compensate better 1x7 liftarm weight.

Philo
www.philohome.com


Thanks,

I'll be trying it out soon myself. I figured that if it lifted its foot off
the ground, it would more easily be considered a walker. I hope you have fun
watching it stomp around :).

-jrl

P.S. Are you planning on taking any pics?



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: baby walker
 
(...) Here they are: The 5 pieces version looks really disproportionate: (URL) 6 pieces is nicer and "walks" well: (URL) (350K) Philo www.philohome.com (22 years ago, 6-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)  

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: baby walker
 
(...) Actually no, the double bent liftarm has no point where it balances perfectly. (...) yes, (URL) (but I've none yet!) (...) Sure you can !!! (...) Yes it works, but to rise the foot completely you have to add the bottom motor part. I had a (...) (22 years ago, 6-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)

43 Messages in This Thread:



















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR