| |
It works!
http://www.philohome.com/misc/walker7.jpg
http://www.philohome.com/misc/walker7b.jpg
...but stability is obtained more from wire stiffness than from 2x4 brick
(not heavy enough, without wire motor would turn over when in topmost position)
Cheers,
Philo
www.philohome.com
>
> I've got an idea for a walker similar to this one that only uses seven pieces!
> I can't try it out yet because I don't have a micro motor yet either, but it
> seems like it should work. It uses a 1x2 technic brick with 2 holes
> connected directly to the micro motor (the output is the shape of a regular
> stud BTW) which is then connected to an 11.5 long double bent liftarm with a
> technic pin. Also, it has a 2x4 brick under the motor for stability and uses
> a 19 long flexible axle to make up the rest of the foot.
>
> -jrl
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: baby walker
|
| (...) Cool! I figured that the stiffness of the wire would help. I guess I'll call it Shorty ,as it's only a little over an inch tall :). Now I've just got to get that micro motor ordered so I can try it out myself. I'm wondering if you could try (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: baby walker
|
| (...) I've got an idea for a walker similar to this one that only uses seven pieces! I can't try it out yet because I don't have a micro motor yet either, but it seems like it should work. It uses a 1x2 technic brick with 2 holes connected directly (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
