Subject:
|
Re: Tempted in buying my first Mindstorms invention kit - 1.5 vs 2.0 ?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 18 Dec 2002 02:37:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
793 times
|
| |
|
|
I have one of each RCX (1.0, 1.5 , 2.0) and have tested the signals using a
palm app called IRMonitor with little or no difference between the three.
This is by no means a "labratory test".
Haveyou noticed this with more than one brick?
For the original poster, the differences between the kits are negligible
with the number of tools and resources available online. if givin a choice
get a 1.0 for the power adaptor capabilities.
Just get one, the are great fun!
Jeff Wood
David Schilling" <davidNO@SPAMsunteleia.com> wrote in message
news:H7AIrF.30D@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.robotics, Steve Baker <sjbaker1@airmail.net> writes:
> > Roy Nelson wrote:
> > > To add to Stephane question:
> > >
> > > Are there any hardware differences between between the 2.0, 1.5, and • 1.0
> > > versions of the RCX brick? Has anyone noticed any performance • differences?
> >
> > The only difference is that the 1.0 brick has an external power connector
> > so you can save batteries while testing by plugging in an external mains
> > adaptor.
> >
> > In all other respects, the three bricks are identical.
>
> Actually I've noticed that the 2.0 brick's IR capabilities don't seem to • be
> as strong as the 1.0/1.5 bricks. I don't know why this would be, if
> something got changed in the hardware? It isn't an issue for most things,
> but if you want bricks talking to each other, and need them to talk across • a
> room, this might be an issue.
>
> Can anyone confirm this with some sort of laboratory test? (Using an IR
> photon counter, or something? :-)
>
> --
> David Schilling
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
