Subject:
|
Re: Newbie has an idea - Nascar style racing?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:08:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2512 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Steve Baker <sjbaker1@airmail.net> writes:
> Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> > In lugnet.robotics, Jeff Wood writes:
> > For it to catch on, (for many people to try it) it would have to be possible
> > & easy to do at home. So it would start with one class, limited to only
> > Mindstorm RIS parts. 2 motors, 1 light & 2 touch sensors.
>
> Yes - I agree - but having a second 'formula' to allow for the experts
> to race honking great machines with multiple RCX's and a dozen motors
> would be nice.
Yes. But start simple.
> > But then it would be easy to print out the mat on a standard printer (not
> > durable) and cover the bottom of the table. What size are most plotters?
>
> Most people don't have access to plotters. The most likely thing that
> everyone will have would be a standard ink jet printer with A4 or
> Letter sized paper.
As Brass said, Kinkos can do 3' by X Or, I'm sure it would be possible to
make a Word document that can be taped together.
> IMHO, the rules should specify a minimum track width, a minimum
> turn radius - and just tell drivers that the entire track will fit
> within a 2'x4' space.
2'x4'? no, that's much too small. (This may be where we loose people) I
was thinking 4' x 8' with 2' radius turns, and a normal width of ~2'.
Then, if the robots were limited to 8" wide, they could still run 3 wide
(almost!)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Newbie has an idea - Nascar style racing?
|
| (...) Yes - I agree - but having a second 'formula' to allow for the experts to race honking great machines with multiple RCX's and a dozen motors would be nice. (...) Most people don't have access to plotters. The most likely thing that everyone (...) (24 years ago, 22-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
