 | | Re: Looking for correct terminology —Brian B. Alano
|
| | | If I read you right, that is the correct term, and you have a camber of (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Looking for correct terminology —Dean Hystad
|
| | | | (...) I see I haven't succeeded in describing the information I am looking for. I know what camber is. I work for a company that makes equipment for testing vehicle suspension kinematics, compliance, performance and durability. I spent the last (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | RE: Looking for correct terminology —Ralph Hempel
|
| | | | Dean, After looking at the Androbot, I *finally* figured out what is going on here. At first glance, it looks like the robot has some extra camber - well, a LOT of camber. But what is it doing, exactly? In a normal robot the wheels that go straight (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Looking for correct terminology —Dean Hystad
|
| | | | (...) Ralph, You are correct sir. By keeping the CG near the ground and having such aggressive camber, my robot is actually quite stable. It uses the big 81mm balloon tires at about -75 degrees of camber and will recover from being tipped forward or (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Looking for correct terminology —Rob Limbaugh
|
| | | | (...) Well, it's obvious... ....put a temperature sensor on the bot and see if it can bring you the beer without shaking it up! :) (22 years ago, 26-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
