To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 18471
  Re: Looking for correct terminology
 
(...) I don't know if camber is the correct term to use here. If so, my robot wheels have 75 degrees of camber, and the wheels are cambered in instead of out (the wheelbase is really narrow). It's really a different kind of wheel design. I'm not (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Looking for correct terminology
 
If I read you right, that is the correct term, and you have a camber of (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Looking for correct terminology
 
(...) I see I haven't succeeded in describing the information I am looking for. I know what camber is. I work for a company that makes equipment for testing vehicle suspension kinematics, compliance, performance and durability. I spent the last (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  RE: Looking for correct terminology
 
Dean, After looking at the Androbot, I *finally* figured out what is going on here. At first glance, it looks like the robot has some extra camber - well, a LOT of camber. But what is it doing, exactly? In a normal robot the wheels that go straight (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Looking for correct terminology
 
(...) Ralph, You are correct sir. By keeping the CG near the ground and having such aggressive camber, my robot is actually quite stable. It uses the big 81mm balloon tires at about -75 degrees of camber and will recover from being tipped forward or (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Looking for correct terminology
 
(...) Well, it's obvious... ....put a temperature sensor on the bot and see if it can bring you the beer without shaking it up! :) (22 years ago, 26-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR