Subject:
|
Re: Rechargeable batteries and the RCX
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 08:41:14 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Steve Baker <sjbaker1@airmail&Spamcake&.net>
|
Reply-To:
|
sjbaker1@airmail.=ihatespam=net
|
Viewed:
|
461 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Laura O'Grady wrote:
> Thanks to all that responded to my questions regarding batteries. I was
> concerned about a post I read in rec.toys.lego in which someone reported
> problems after switching to alkaline rechargeable batteries (the post can
> be seen at the following URL):
>
> http://groups.google.ca/groups?q=mindstorms+rechargeable+batteries&hl=en&lr=
> &ie=UTF-8&selm=QztA7.188976%24bY5.891564%40news-server.bigpond.net.au&rnum=1
>
> The problem reported seems to be associated with rechargeable alkalines
> leaking at the terminals, rather than rechargeable batteries in general.
Well, all Alkaline batteries (rechargeable or not) do this if left in
equipment in a discharged state.
Both NiMH and rechargeable alkalines have a limited life and have to be
discarded sooner or later. Some of the older ones claimed to be good for
only 100 charge/discharge cycles - and in practice would sometimes only
last for 20 or 30 cycles. The more modern ones claim much longer lives,
but this leakage phenomenon is still a problem if they are left discharged.
I always recharge mine after use and I havn't seen any of these problems.
NiCd's (for all that Cadmium is bad for the environment) do have a (potentially)
infinite life - so in principle they never need to be discarded and as a result
could be said to be better for the environment than the alternatives. However,
because they only generate 1.2 volts, they are not suitable for a lot of modern
equipment so they are probably on the way out.
----------------------------- Steve Baker -------------------------------
Mail : <sjbaker1@airmail.net> WorkMail: <sjbaker@link.com>
URLs : http://www.sjbaker.org
http://plib.sf.net http://tuxaqfh.sf.net http://tuxkart.sf.net
http://prettypoly.sf.net http://freeglut.sf.net
http://toobular.sf.net http://lodestone.sf.net
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Rechargeable batteries and the RCX
|
| Thanks to all that responded to my questions regarding batteries. I was concerned about a post I read in rec.toys.lego in which someone reported problems after switching to alkaline rechargeable batteries (the post can be seen at the following URL): (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
8 Messages in This Thread: ![Rechargeable batteries and the RCX -Laura O'Grady (12-Jul-02 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Rechargeable batteries and the RCX -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Mike Payson) (13-Jul-02 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Rechargeable batteries and the RCX -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Steve Baker) (13-Jul-02 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![RE: Rechargeable batteries and the RCX -- Firmware error -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (12-Jul-02 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Rechargeable batteries and the RCX -- Firmware error -Trevyn Watson (13-Jul-02 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Rechargeable batteries and the RCX -Laura O'Grady (14-Jul-02 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Rechargeable batteries and the RCX -Dave Baum (14-Jul-02 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|