Subject:
|
Re: Navigation using landmarks (Was: Re: lasers and RCX)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:51:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
769 times
|
| |
|
|
http://www.robogeeks.com/mousehack.htm
Bluey7
In lugnet.robotics, sjbaker1@airmail.net writes:
> Rob Limbaugh wrote:
> > A Killough platform may have 3 motors, but it operates in a X-Y coordinate plane, not X-Y-Z.
>
> When I said "three degrees of freedom" - I didn't mean "X-Y-Z", I mean't X, Y and Rotation-about-Z.
>
> Whilst (in theory) a Killough platform moves in X and Y only - they do rotate a little in practice.
>
> > Rethinking the clearance issue... perhaps a Lego magnifying glass could help. The focal points seem to be around an inch from the lense (or so).
>
> From reading the specifications for the mouse chip, I get the impression that the magnification
> has to be quite precise in order for it to work. I'd be very suprised if something as simple as
> sticking any old lens beneath it would work.
>
> ----------------------------- Steve Baker -------------------------------
> Mail : <sjbaker1@airmail.net> WorkMail: <sjbaker@link.com>
> URLs : http://www.sjbaker.org
> http://plib.sf.net http://tuxaqfh.sf.net http://tuxkart.sf.net
> http://prettypoly.sf.net http://freeglut.sf.net
> http://toobular.sf.net http://lodestone.sf.net
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Navigation using landmarks (Was: Re: lasers and RCX)
|
| (...) When I said "three degrees of freedom" - I didn't mean "X-Y-Z", I mean't X, Y and Rotation-about-Z. Whilst (in theory) a Killough platform moves in X and Y only - they do rotate a little in practice. (...) From reading the specifications for (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
