Subject:
|
Re: Curved Feet
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 23 Mar 2001 04:16:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1656 times
|
| |
|
|
/nitpick on/
> Unfortunately, there is a HUGE technology gap between these toys and true
> bipedal articulation. The reason is that intelligent systems must control
> the axes of each joint, but also in tandem with the state of it's partner
> joint on the other leg. The simplest bipedal leg requires at least 4 joints
> (toe, heel, knee, hip), each at least biaxial due to the fact that each
> joint must manage the side to side balance. You would have to gang motors,
Technically, you can't move your knee joint laterally. As for lateral
toe movement - it's so small as to be trivial.
/nitpick off/
Matthias Jetleb
VA3-MWJ
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Curved Feet
|
| Andy, I think the curved foot concept is the wrong direction for a two-legged mechanism. The few simple two-legged mechanisms I have seen rely on two feet, each with a VERY large footprint. Each footprint is large enough to support the weight of the (...) (26 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
