 | | Re: RIS SDK - Comments and questions
|
|
(...) It's *far* from an intelligent motor! It's a pain to use even as a simple motor. You can't even tell it "turn on and keep running forever"... which seems like a pretty basic operation for any motor! The darned thing runs for a few seconds, (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RIS SDK - Comments and questions
|
|
Harley Myler wrote: <snip> (...) <snip> I would hardly call the Microscout an intelligent motor...in technical definition, perhaps; in practical usability, far from it. In fact, I would say that the Microscout is *less* intelligent than a plain old (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RIS SDK - Comments and questions
|
|
(...) Interesting comment, frankly I am surprised. The MicroScout (MS) is far from a "piece of junk" considering the fact that you can get the DDK for $40 (I might modify my opinion if the price jumped much higher than this). Irrespective of good vs (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 2.31b 1 and the RCXcc
|
|
(...) back (...) that (...) I had no problems editing autoexec.bat using notepad, saving it to C:, rebooting and checking that the autoexec.bat file was as I had edited it. Alan C (24 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 2.31b 1 and the RCXcc
|
|
(...) How about the "protection function" on ME? A friend of mine tried to set his keyboard layout in autoexec.bat, but every time he rebooted, ME put back the original autoexec.bat. I believe this "feature" is meant to prevent users to mess around (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
