| |
Well I guess we are using the term "computer" a little loosely. But if it
could play tic-tac-toe then it made decisions based variable input, thats
kind of like a computer. And using an RCX would definitely NOT count.
Bob
In lugnet.robotics, Eric Joslin writes:
> In lugnet.robotics, David Eaton writes:
>
> > Of
> > course, I seem to remember that Mario Ferrari (I think it was him?) built
> > one using an RCX-- does that count? ;)
>
> It was Mario and Marco Beri, they had it with them at Mindfest. I don't know
> if Mario's brother Gulio had any input into it, so if I'm leaving him out
> accidentally don't hit me.
>
> eric
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Building a computer from Lego's
|
| (...) What if you used the RCX to power each subsystem, but not the entire computer? For example, one RCX for the keyboard, another on the tape drive, and another on the output. They communicate via the IR ports (or by raising and lowering flags (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | Re: Building a computer from Lego's
|
| (...) I'm pretty sure the Tinkertoy 'computer' was basically a look-up table that had all positions coded into it with the correct responses, making use of symmetries to cut down the size of lookup needed. I don't really consider that to be a (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
23 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
