 | | Re: MOC: Radio Controlled Tank.
|
|
(...) Wow...this creation looks awesome. Great work! (...) Heheh...That seems like it would be really neat...they must have been quite surprised :-) As a side note, does anyone know how one can get extra polarity switches? They appear in some older (...) (25 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Old idea or new idea?
|
|
(...) idea (...) Lego uses standard TV remote control technology, but passes ASCII serial data instead of TV REMOTE commands. Before Mindstorms was around, I built (and sold a few) battery operated control units for use with Lego motors. This (...) (25 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | How2 'count' in NQC
|
|
In NQC you count by adding 1 to a variable like this: int counter; counter += 1 But it's hard to know *how much* you have counted; however, you can build a little program to (say) flash a light when you reach a certain count. I have spent about 4 (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX Blowed up?
|
|
"Dean Husby" <nntp@akasa.bc.ca> schreef in bericht news:39FF5AFC.56C070...a.bc.ca... (...) from (...) It (...) interchangable. (...) then (...) In my opinion, 9V DC 500mA to 1A or 8V AC 500mA to 1A Answers this your question ? Rik (25 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Old idea or new idea?
|
|
"John Barnes" <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> schreef in bericht news:4.2.0.58.200011...lserver... (...) but the problem is , Lego doesn't used a standard IR-protocol but a carier-based IR-communication. And that means filters demodulation and a lot of (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX respond time
|
|
"Eelco Kooiker" <eelco@kooiker.demon.nl> schreef in bericht news:G3EsvE.BI1@lugnet.com... (...) is (...) each (...) 3 (...) excelent work of Kekoa Proudfoot (Tolkien ?) speaks about 10mS clicks in with a task is activated, so I presume that there (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Old idea or new idea?
|
|
Ralph Hempel wrote: >Sounds like the MIT "Cricket" to me John.... >As an embedded guy yourself, you know this means distributing >power to each brick with its own battery, unless you want a wire >in which case you might as well use a standard serial (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Old idea or new idea?
|
|
(...) Sounds like the MIT "Cricket" to me John.... As an embedded guy yourself, you know this means distributing power to each brick with its own battery, unless you want a wire in which case you might as well use a standard serial link :-) Maybe (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Old idea or new idea?
|
|
While pondering the merits of various schemes for adding more I/O to the RCX, and having already built a few different schemes myself just to be able to test drive them, I was struck by the interesting possiblity of seriously extending the RCX my (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Palm Hardware Interface idea?
|
|
Got some specs for the SV200 controller board that the PPRK uses: The SV203 is a Microchip PIC16C73 microcontroller based servo motor controller board. It accepts RS232 serial data signal from a host computer and outputs PWM (pulse width modulated) (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.palm)
|
