 | | Re: Old idea or new idea?
|
|
"John Barnes" <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> schreef in bericht news:4.2.0.58.200011...lserver... (...) but the problem is , Lego doesn't used a standard IR-protocol but a carier-based IR-communication. And that means filters demodulation and a lot of (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX respond time
|
|
"Eelco Kooiker" <eelco@kooiker.demon.nl> schreef in bericht news:G3EsvE.BI1@lugnet.com... (...) is (...) each (...) 3 (...) excelent work of Kekoa Proudfoot (Tolkien ?) speaks about 10mS clicks in with a task is activated, so I presume that there (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Old idea or new idea?
|
|
Ralph Hempel wrote: >Sounds like the MIT "Cricket" to me John.... >As an embedded guy yourself, you know this means distributing >power to each brick with its own battery, unless you want a wire >in which case you might as well use a standard serial (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Old idea or new idea?
|
|
(...) Sounds like the MIT "Cricket" to me John.... As an embedded guy yourself, you know this means distributing power to each brick with its own battery, unless you want a wire in which case you might as well use a standard serial link :-) Maybe (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Old idea or new idea?
|
|
While pondering the merits of various schemes for adding more I/O to the RCX, and having already built a few different schemes myself just to be able to test drive them, I was struck by the interesting possiblity of seriously extending the RCX my (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
