 | | Re: RCX respond time
|
|
"Eelco Kooiker" <eelco@kooiker.demon.nl> schreef in bericht news:G3EsvE.BI1@lugnet.com... (...) is (...) each (...) 3 (...) excelent work of Kekoa Proudfoot (Tolkien ?) speaks about 10mS clicks in with a task is activated, so I presume that there (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Old idea or new idea?
|
|
Ralph Hempel wrote: >Sounds like the MIT "Cricket" to me John.... >As an embedded guy yourself, you know this means distributing >power to each brick with its own battery, unless you want a wire >in which case you might as well use a standard serial (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Old idea or new idea?
|
|
(...) Sounds like the MIT "Cricket" to me John.... As an embedded guy yourself, you know this means distributing power to each brick with its own battery, unless you want a wire in which case you might as well use a standard serial link :-) Maybe (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Old idea or new idea?
|
|
While pondering the merits of various schemes for adding more I/O to the RCX, and having already built a few different schemes myself just to be able to test drive them, I was struck by the interesting possiblity of seriously extending the RCX my (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Palm Hardware Interface idea?
|
|
Got some specs for the SV200 controller board that the PPRK uses: The SV203 is a Microchip PIC16C73 microcontroller based servo motor controller board. It accepts RS232 serial data signal from a host computer and outputs PWM (pulse width modulated) (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.palm)
|
