 | | Re: Is Robotics Discovery Set good?
|
|
(...) Brad, if you can, go for the RCX (RIS) It will be usable for MANY years to come as you grow. I have all three units and I can tell you that the RCX (RIS) is the best. There was another message group that discussed all this in detail. (URL) the (...) (25 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.loc.ca.on)
|
| |
| | Re: Floating Point Arithmetic (Re: NQC with C++ header file)
|
|
Jose- That's great! Remind me to mention that when I release the newest version of the Linux + Lego HOWTO, if you don't see it there. Luis (...) (25 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Is Robotics Discovery Set good?
|
|
(...) The RDS is a really cool set. And if it is your first time programming then i think its the way to go. The only real drawbacks i see with the scout is it does not support the rotation sensor and it only has two inputs(that you can change (...) (25 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.loc.ca.on)
|
| |
| | Is Robotics Discovery Set good?
|
|
I got a catalog today from a science store in Toronto, and it has relativley low priced Mindstorms. There are Droid Developers for $105.00, and Robotics Discovery for $159.95. This is quite close to the American price, so I think it is a better (...) (25 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.loc.ca.on)
|
| |
| | Re: What is with the Technic Stormtrooper?
|
|
(...) Umm. I've been chopping the ball and 1/2 inch of cross axle off those useless arm pieces for a while. They make very handy spherical joints to connect parts at odd angles. You can also chop the other end including the first two technic holes (...) (25 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: single motor pneumatic pump and switch
|
|
Nice idea. I don't have pneumatics yet, but the same idea can be applied to different applications. For example, I want to build a arm with a grabber that first closes the "hand" then lifts the arm. I believe your idea using the differential will (...) (25 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: LEGO 2001
|
|
(...) Ahhhh, the lure of numbers :-) (...) Agreed. I know about a half dozen kids that have these sets, and most of them would rather watch TV! Don't forget that a lot of these kits are in schools. They are dumped on teachers that have little or no (...) (25 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | RE: NQC with C++ header file
|
|
Curiosity piqued, I took a look around Google and found (among others)..... (URL) haven't waded through the math manually yet, but this doesn't look too awful. Perhaps I am ignorantly naive. It sure would be neat to have sin and cos on demand. Jeff (...) (25 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: LEGO 2001
|
|
Jeffrey Hazen (11:58 AM 10.25.2000) wrote: >The scans are interesting, but I'm afraid there isn't much excitement >robotics-wise. > >An interesting note: The serial number on one of the RCX bricks in the >scans is 502273. The earliest serial number (...) (25 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: LEGO 2001
|
|
>Jeff wrote: > >That means (with some assumptions about completeness) Lego has banged out >over half a million of these yellow bricks.... Really? Even one tenth that number is still a sea of yellow bricks! So where is everybody? Why are there only (...) (25 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
