Subject:
|
Re: XCAM confusion
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 May 2000 19:10:59 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Chris Osborn <FOZZTEXX@FULLSYSTEM.stopspammersCOM>
|
Viewed:
|
612 times
|
| |
|
|
On May. 11 00, 11:54 PDT, "Urbanski Paul-W15470"
<Paul.Urbanski@motorola.com> wrote:
> Are you sure the original XCAM doesn't need to be attached to
> anything? When I called to order one, they told me that for the
> original XCAM to work it had to stay attached to the RF transmitter
> unit (which is about the size of your hand).
Yes, I'm sure, I have one.
The camera has a standard RCA mail connector on the back of it,
and puts out a standard NTSC signal. The connector is right on the
back, no cable coming off of it at all. I just got a 6 foot RCA
male to RCA female cable, and plugged that into the camera and into
my video capture card.
---
Chris Osborn Full System, Inc.
fozztexx@fullsystem.com 2160 Jefferson St., #240
http://www.fullsystem.com/ Napa, CA 94559
Webhosting that *works* - 99.99% uptime - First 3 months free
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: XCAM confusion
|
| (...) To follow up on Chris' accurate explanation it works exactly the same way as the Xcam2. The Xcam2 just has 20 feet of cable and a crappy mic. The BEST remote model would be the all in one unit. I have one of all the models and find the latter (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
