To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 11476
11475  |  11477
Subject: 
Re: XCAM confusion
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Fri, 12 May 2000 06:01:37 GMT
Viewed: 
781 times
  
Hiya,

  I have both the original Xcam and the Xcam 2.  The camera is the same on both
units.  The Xcam 2 has the transmitter and camera integrated into a very small
package.  The camera is removable and just a plain NTSC color cam when removed
from the transmitter.  The original does not have sound integrated (at least I
never noticed it) but the Xcam 2 has a low quality mike built in.

  So, if you just wanted a tiny camera, and the original Xcam camera is TINY,
and want to use your own NTSC transmitter or just a coax line, this is your
beast.

DLC



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: XCAM confusion
 
(...) To follow up on Chris' accurate explanation it works exactly the same way as the Xcam2. The Xcam2 just has 20 feet of cable and a crappy mic. The BEST remote model would be the all in one unit. I have one of all the models and find the latter (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-00, to lugnet.robotics)

3 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    
Active threads in Robotics

 
Verified and Trusted Team of Hackers
18 hours ago
Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR