To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / *48197 (-5)
  Re: Train motors comparison
 
(...) Ditto, except 6 wide. Thanks, Phillipe. Ed (15 years ago, 1-Sep-10, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics, FTX)
 
  Re: Train motors comparison
 
(...) Okay, this is awesome work, Philippe, to see the comparison of the new PF motor vs the 9 volt motor. As an eight wider, I always lamented the underpowered 9 volt motor in its attempts to pull heavy, 8 wide consists. But it wasn't such an issue (...) (15 years ago, 1-Sep-10, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics, FTX)
 
  Re: Train motors comparison
 
(...) Very nice Philo, thanks! ROSCO (15 years ago, 1-Sep-10, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics, FTX)
 
  Train motors comparison
 
(URL) The 9V, RC and Power Functions train motors compete around a track under close scrutiny of an on-board NXT... Complete test results (URL) here>. Enjoy! Philo (15 years ago, 31-Aug-10, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics, FTX) ! 
 
  Re: Text languages for programming NXT?
 
I'm getting back into Mindstorms after a long hiatus. Let me resurrect this old thread, to see what the answer is in 2010. :-) What text-based languages are most mature and best-supported these days for programming RCX and NXT? Is RobotC still (...) (15 years ago, 28-Aug-10, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR